Price remains range bound. All Elliott wave counts remain valid.

This week’s GDX analysis may indicate which Elliott wave count may be more likely for Gold.

Summary: Analysis of GDX, which is bearish, supports the combination wave count for Gold; with confidence in the analysis of GDX, the combination wave count has a higher probability.

It looks like Gold may now continue lower next week towards a target at 1,132.

If price turns upwards and breaks above the upper edge of the channel on the daily charts, then expect a continuation of upwards movement to last several weeks and reach about 1,305 – 1,310.

Always trade with stops to protect your account. Risk only 1-5% of equity on any one trade.

New updates to this analysis are in bold.

Grand SuperCycle analysis is here.

Last historic analysis with monthly charts and several weekly alternates is here, video is here.

Weekly charts will all again be reviewed at the end of this week. They are published in order of probability based upon classic technical analysis.

MAIN ELLIOTT WAVE COUNT

WEEKLY CHART – COMBINATION

Click chart to enlarge.

There are four remaining weekly wave counts at this time for cycle wave b: a triangle, flat, combination or double zigzag.

All four weekly wave counts are again considered at the end of this week. Only two shall be followed on a daily basis.

At this stage, this wave count may have a slightly higher probability than the other three weekly wave counts because it has more support from classic technical analysis.

If cycle wave b is a combination, then the first structure in a double may be a complete zigzag labelled primary wave W.

The double may be joined by a three in the opposite direction, a zigzag labelled primary wave X.

The second structure in the double may be a flat correction labelled primary wave Y. My research on Gold so far has found that the most common two structures in a double combination are one zigzag and one flat correction. I have found only one instance where a triangle unfolded for wave Y. The most likely structure for wave Y would be a flat correction by a very wide margin, so that is what this wave count shall expect.

Within a flat correction for primary wave Y, the current downwards wave of intermediate wave (B) may be a single or multiple zigzag; for now it shall be labelled as a single. Intermediate wave (B) must retrace a minimum 0.9 length of intermediate wave (A) at 1,147.34. Intermediate wave (B) may move beyond the start of intermediate wave (A) as in an expanded flat.

Because the minimum requirement for intermediate wave (B) is not yet met, this wave count requires that minute wave v of minor wave C of intermediate wave (B) continues lower. This is the most immediately bearish of all four weekly wave counts.

When intermediate wave (B) is complete, then intermediate wave (C) would be expected to make at least a slight new high above the end of intermediate wave (A) at 1,365.68 to avoid a truncation. Primary wave Y would be most likely to end about the same level as primary wave W at 1,374.91, so that the whole structure takes up time and moves price sideways, as that is the purpose of double combinations.

While double combinations are very common, triples are extremely rare. I have found no examples of triple combinations for Gold at daily chart time frames or higher back to 1976. When the second structure in a double is complete, then it is extremely likely (almost certain) that the whole correction is over.

DAILY CHART – COMBINATION

Click chart to enlarge.

Intermediate wave (B) may be unfolding lower as either a single or double zigzag. At this stage, a single zigzag will be considered; the expected direction nor minimum requirement at 1,147.34 do not differ from a double zigzag.

If intermediate wave (B) is unfolding as a single zigzag, then within it minor wave C must subdivide as a five wave impulse. The labelling today is changed now to see minute wave iii over at the last low and the last bounce as minute wave iv.

It is possible that minute wave iv is now complete as a relatively brief and shallow zigzag. It is also possible that it may continue sideways for another one to few weeks as a flat, combination or triangle. Minute wave iv may not move into minute wave i price territory above 1,282.20.

HOURLY CHART

Click chart to enlarge.

This wave count sees the last upwards wave a completed zigzag now labelled minute wave iv.

If minute wave iv is complete, then minute wave v may have begun.

Minute wave v must subdivide as a five wave motive structure. There may now be three overlapping first and second waves complete within the impulse. This wave count would now be expecting an increase in downwards momentum to develop next week as the middle of a third wave unfolds.

Within the middle of the third wave, micro wave 2 may not move beyond the start of micro wave 1 above 1,208.28.

The target is recalculated.

WEEKLY CHART – TRIANGLE

Click chart to enlarge.

The triangle so far has the best fit and look, but at this stage it no longer has good support from classic technical analysis of the last two weeks price movement. It is now judged to have a slightly lower probability than the combination wave count.

Cycle wave b may be an incomplete triangle. The triangle may be a contracting or barrier triangle, with a contracting triangle looking much more likely because the A-C trend line does not have a strong slope. A contracting triangle could see the B-D trend line have a stronger slope, so that the triangle trend lines converge at a reasonable rate. A barrier triangle would have a B-D trend line that would be essentially flat, and the triangle trend lines would barely converge.

Within a contracting triangle, primary wave D may not move beyond the end of primary wave B below 1,123.08. Within a barrier triangle, primary wave D may end about the same level as primary wave B at 1,123.08, so that the B-D trend line is essentially flat. Only a new low reasonably below 1,123.08 would invalidate the triangle.

Within both a contracting and barrier triangle, primary wave E may not move beyond the end of primary wave C above 1,365.68.

Four of the five sub-waves of a triangle must be zigzags, with only one sub-wave allowed to be a multiple zigzag. Primary wave C is the most common sub-wave to subdivide as a multiple, and this is how primary wave C for this example fits best.

Primary wave D must be a single structure, most likely a zigzag.

There are no problems in terms of subdivisions or rare structures for this wave count. It has an excellent fit and so far a typical look.

A channel is drawn on all charts about the downwards wave of primary wave D. Here, it is labelled a best fit channel. If this channel is breached by upwards movement, that may provide reasonable confidence in this weekly triangle wave count and the double zigzag count, and put serious doubt on the combination and flat wave counts.

This wave count now expects a consolidation for primary wave E to back test resistance at prior support, and then a significant new downwards wave for cycle wave C. For the long term, this is the most bearish wave count.

DAILY CHART – TRIANGLE

Click chart to enlarge.

Primary wave D may again be complete. For Barchart data, there is a Morning Doji Star candlestick reversal pattern at the low.

For confidence, this wave count now requires a breach of the upper edge of the blue best fit channel. This channel is drawn the same way on all weekly and daily charts, all on a semi-log scale.

Upwards movement to the high is labelled minor wave 1. However, this upwards movement looks very strongly like a three wave structure at the daily chart level, which does not support this wave count this week.

A target for primary wave E is the strong zone of resistance about 1,305 to 1,310. Primary wave E is most likely to subdivide as a zigzag (although it may also subdivide as a triangle to create a rare nine wave triangle), and it should last at least a Fibonacci 13 weeks. Primary wave E may not move beyond the end of primary wave C above 1,365.68.

HOURLY CHART

Click chart to enlarge.

It is possible that a five up completed for minor wave 1 at the last high. However, this does look strongly like a three wave structure on the daily chart, so this wave count does not have the right look. The probability is necessarily reduced.

If a five up was complete, then a three down should follow that may be very deep. If the target for minor wave 2 to end about the 0.618 Fibonacci ratio of minor wave 1 is wrong, then it may be not low enough. The first second wave correction within a new trend for Gold is often (not always) very deep.

Minor wave 2 may be an incomplete zigzag. It may not move beyond the start of minor wave 1 below 1,160.75.

WEEKLY CHART – FLAT

Click chart to enlarge.

It is possible that cycle wave b may be a flat correction. Within a flat correction, primary wave B must retrace a minimum 0.9 length of primary wave A at 1,079.13 or below. Primary wave B may make a new low below the start of primary wave A at 1,046.27 as in an expanded flat correction.

Only a new low reasonably below 1,123.08 would provide reasonable confidence in this wave count.

Intermediate wave (C) must subdivide as a five wave structure; it may be unfolding as an impulse. Within intermediate wave (C), minor waves 1, 2 and now 3 may be complete. A consolidation to last about 5 to 13 weeks may now develop for minor wave 4. Minor wave 4 may not move into minor wave 1 price territory above 1,307.09.

This wave count differs from the triangle wave count in that it expects a possibly more brief and more shallow correction to unfold here.

The blue channel here is drawn using Elliott’s first technique. Minor wave 4 would be most likely to remain contained within this channel, and may find resistance about the upper edge if it gets there. A strong breach of this channel by upwards movement would reduce the probability of this wave count.

Minor wave 2 was a double zigzag lasting nine weeks. To exhibit alternation and reasonable proportion minor wave 4 may be a flat, combination or triangle and may last a little longer than nine weeks as these types of corrections can be longer lasting than zigzags or zigzag multiples.

WEEKLY CHART – DOUBLE ZIGZAG

Click chart to enlarge.

Finally, it is also possible that cycle wave b may be a double zigzag or a double combination.

The first zigzag in the double is labelled primary wave W. This has a good fit.

The double may be joined by a corrective structure in the opposite direction, a triangle labelled primary wave X. The triangle would be about two thirds complete.

Within the triangle of primary wave X, intermediate wave (C) may now be complete. It may not move beyond the end of intermediate wave (A) below 1,123.08. The A-C trend line for both a barrier and contracting triangle should have some reasonable slope. For the triangle of primary wave X to have the right look, intermediate wave (C) should end here or very soon indeed.

This wave count may now expect choppy overlapping movement in an ever decreasing range for several more months. After the triangle is complete, then an upwards breakout would be expected from it.

Primary wave Y would most likely be a zigzag because primary wave X would be shallow; double zigzags normally have relatively shallow X waves.

Primary wave Y may also be a flat correction if cycle wave b is a double combination, but combinations normally have deep X waves. This would be less likely.

This wave count has good proportions and no problems in terms of subdivisions.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS

WEEKLY CHART

Click chart to enlarge. Chart courtesy of StockCharts.com.

On Balance Volume is lower than its prior point at the end of November 2015. This divergence is extremely bearish but does not rule out a consolidation unfolding here; the divergence does strongly support the Triangle wave count, which expects a consolidation or bounce up to test resistance now and then a continuation of a major bear market. It could also support the flat wave count that allows for a new low below 1,046.27 in coming months.

When Gold has a strong trend, ADX may remain very extreme for long periods of time and RSI can move more deeply into oversold. However, most recent lows since November 2015 were all found when RSI just reached oversold, so some caution here in looking out for a possible consolidation or trend change would be reasonable.

The last week is inconclusive. Price moved higher, but the balance of volume was downwards and the candlestick closed red. The short term volume profile remains bearish, which supports the idea of more downwards movement shortly.

If price does continue lower, then look for next support about 1,140.

DAILY CHART

Click chart to enlarge. Chart courtesy of StockCharts.com.

Support below is now about 1,140.

When a trend is very extreme, it is time to look out for candlestick reversal patterns and a possible trend reversal to the opposite direction, or a reasonable sideways move to relieve extreme conditions. Here, there is a Hammer reversal pattern at the low (it is almost a Dragonfly doji, but there is a little too great an upper shadow for that pattern). This is a warning that a low may now be in place.

The short term volume profile remains slightly bearish with some support for downwards movement.

The last small bounce has relieved extreme oversold conditions. There is again room for price to fall.

A low in place may now only be seriously considered if the channel on the Elliott wave counts is breached by upwards movement.

GDX WEEKLY CHART

Click chart to enlarge. Chart courtesy of StockCharts.com.

GDX is now moving lower exactly as expected.

After a breakout, a technical principle is the longer that price consolidates sideways the longer the resulting trend may be expected to be. Also, the longer that price meanders sideways the more energy may be released after a breakout. This is what is happening now for GDX.

The target for this downwards trend to end is calculated using the measured rule. The widest part of the consolidation is added to the breakout point at 20.80 giving a target at 16.02. That is not yet met.

At the weekly chart level, there is a clear downwards breakout with a breakaway gap. As breakaway gaps should not be closed, they may be used to set stops that may be set just above a downwards breakaway gap.

The last weekly candlestick is bearish with a long upper wick and a close near the low for the week. A lack of support from volume is not a concern as price can continue to fall of its own weight.

The bullish divergence between price and On Balance Volume noted with green trend lines is also not a strong signal. On Balance Volume is a leading indicator; when it leads, it offers a signal, but it does not always lead price.

GDX DAILY CHART

Click chart to enlarge. Chart courtesy of StockCharts.com.

GDX has now closed below support on a strong downwards day with support from volume. New lows are the lowest for GDX since December 2016. This is extremely significant for GDX.

GDX is in a downwards trend. Bounces and consolidations may be used as opportunities to join the trend. The last small bounce looks now to be over.

The last measuring gap may provide resistance. A closure of this gap with a new high above 19.74 would be significant; at that stage, it would not be a measuring gap but an exhaustion gap. Assume it is a measuring gap, until proven otherwise.

Looking back over the last 3 1/2 years at GDX, at the daily chart level, I see it can reach extreme levels and remain there while price continues to move a reasonable distance. Only when it has reached very extreme and then exhibits strong divergence may an end to a strong trend be indicated. I would advise members trading GDX at this time to take some time to look over price action of the last few years, with ADX and RSI especially, and study carefully what happened towards at the end of strong trends.

Please remember to protect your trading accounts by careful risk management. Follow my two Golden Rules:

1. Always trade with stops.

2. Risk only 1-5% of equity on any one trade.

A possible target for this downwards trend to end may be now calculated using the measured rule, giving a target about 16.02.

Published @ 04:04 a.m. EST on 1st September, 2018.