Select Page

Last week’s analysis of US Oil expected a correction to continue, which looks like what is happening so far.

Summary: A new high above 41.90 at any stage by any amount would confirm the main wave count and invalidate the alternate. It does not mean the next wave up is underway though; a second wave correction may still be unfolding and the B wave within it may be complete here or very soon. The correction is most likely to end about 31.21. However, there is some cause for concern about this short term expectation as it is not supported by classic technical analysis. A classic upwards breakout looks like it has unfolded over the last two days.

New updates to this analysis are in bold


US Oil Elliott Wave Chart Monthly 2016
Click chart to enlarge.

US Oil has been in a bear market since August 2013. While price remains below the upper edge of the maroon channel drawn here and below the 200 day simple moving average it must be accepted that the bear market most likely remains intact. Price has turned back down from the 200 day moving average and back into the maroon channel.

The structure of primary wave 5 may be complete. This wave count has a problem though: primary wave 5 looks like a three wave structure at the monthly chart level. It may only subdivide as a five.

If primary wave 5 is complete, then the zigzag of Super Cycle wave (II) would also be complete. Super Cycle wave (III) must move above the end of Super Cycle wave (I) at 146.76. Within Super Cycle wave (III), no second wave correction may move beyond the start of its first wave below 26.06.


US Oil Elliott Wave Chart Daily 2016
Click chart to enlarge.

This wave count is identical to the alternate below up to the high labelled intermediate wave (2).

The maroon channel is slightly redrawn. Draw the first trend line from the end of primary waves 2 to the first swing high after primary wave 4 at 61.57, on 24th June, 2015. This upper trend line may show where price is currently finding resistance.

If Super Cycle wave (II) is a complete zigzag, then Super Cycle wave (III) must begin upwards. So far intermediate wave (1) may now be complete as an impulse.

Intermediate wave (1) lasted 28 days (not a Fibonacci number). Intermediate wave (2) should last longer; corrections are usually more time consuming than impulses, particularly first wave impulses. Intermediate wave (2) is most likely to be a zigzag and most likely to end about the 0.618 Fibonacci ratio at 31.21.

At this stage, intermediate wave (2) looks most likely to be either a flat or a zigzag. A new high above 41.90 would invalidate the alternate below and indicate intermediate wave (2) is most likely unfolding as a flat correction. The normal range for a B wave within a flat is 1 to 1.38 the length of the A wave, which gives a normal range of 41.90 to 44.26.

When the small short term cyan trend line along minor wave B is breached clearly by downwards movement, that should be an indication that minor wave B may be over and minor wave C downwards may be underway. At that stage, a target for minor wave C based upon a Fibonacci ratio to minor wave A may be calculated. That cannot be done today because it is not known if minor wave B is complete.

At this stage, the target for intermediate wave (2) to end will remain at the 0.618 Fibonacci ratio of intermediate wave (1) at 31.21. This target may change.

Intermediate wave (2) may not move beyond the start of intermediate wave (1) below 26.06.

Unfortunately, there is no upper price point which would indicate intermediate wave (2) is over at the low labelled minor wave A. There is no rule stating a maximum length for a B wave within a flat, nor an X wave within a combination. There is a convention which states that when the possible B wave is more than twice the length of the A wave the probability of a flat unfolding is so low it should be discarded. That price point would be at 48.31.

It is possible but fairly unlikely that intermediate wave (2) is over at the low labelled minor wave A. It would be more brief and shallow than second wave corrections normally are, but it is possible. If upwards movement continues to be strong and shows an increase in volume, then this possibility would increase in probability.


US Oil Elliott Wave Chart Monthly 2016
Click chart to enlarge.

With the maroon channel being overshot, now this wave count has reduced in probability.

This wave count expects to see an extended wave for primary wave 5, which is common for commodities. This wave count expects primary wave 5 to look like a five wave structure on the monthly chart when it is complete.

Cycle wave c may end with an overshoot for the lower teal trend line for this wave count.


US Oil Elliott Wave Chart Daily 2016
Click chart to enlarge.

If there has been no trend change and if primary wave 5 is incomplete, then at this stage this is the best wave count I can see.

This wave count sees only minor waves 1 and 2 within intermediate wave (3) complete. Minor wave 2 is seen as an expanded flat correction.

Minor wave 2 is ten days longer in duration than intermediate wave (2) one degree higher. This wave count now has a problem with proportions.

Minor wave 2 should have found strong resistance at the upper edge of the channel. It should not be showing up so strongly on the monthly chart. This now gives the wave count an atypical look which reduces its probability.

Minor wave 2 may have ended just above the 0.618 Fibonacci ratio of minor wave 1.

At 11.98 intermediate wave (3) would reach 1.618 the length of intermediate wave (1).

If price makes a new low below 26.06, this wave count would be confirmed.

Within minor wave 3, no second wave correction may move beyond the start of its first wave above 41.90.



US Oil Chart Monthly 2015
Click chart to enlarge. Chart courtesy of

Price shows divergence with RSI as price moved lower.

The fall in price was supported by volume. The rise in price from the low in February is supported by volume. This favours the main wave count.

The three monthly candlesticks for January, February and March create a Morning Doji Star reversal pattern. However, this is a warning of a trend change and not definitive. There is an example of a stronger candlestick reversal pattern on this monthly chart for March and April 2015. April 2015 completed a bullish engulfing candlestick pattern; this is the strongest reversal pattern and this example was particularly strong. Yet it only translated to one more month of slight new highs in May before the downwards trend resumed.

On Balance Volume has broken below two trend lines. OBV is beginning to break above the lower line. If the month of April can close with OBV above the lower orange line, that would be a reasonably strong bullish signal in support of the main Elliott wave count.


US Oil Chart Daily 2015
Click chart to enlarge. Chart courtesy of

Volume flattened off at the end of the last small downwards swing. Now volume has increased substantially as price rises. This supports the idea that the trend is up at this stage.

It looks like a breakaway gap and upwards breakout has occurred in the last two sessions. This does not support the short term expectation from the main Elliott wave count of a downwards swing about here.

ADX is beginning to slightly increase; a new trend may be developing. The +DX line is above the -DX line, so the trend would be up. This also does not support the short term expectation from the main Elliott wave count.

The trend lines on On Balance Volume are redrawn this week. For a strong bullish signal, OBV needs to break above the green line. Unfortunately, this is too far away to be of much use and a lower line with reasonable technical significance cannot be found. OBV may not be of much use in this instance.

Neither RSI nor Stochastics are yet extreme. There is room for further upwards movement in price.

This analysis is published @ 04:34 a.m. EST on 12th April, 2016.