Upwards movement was expected for Monday.
The alternate II Elliott wave count now begins to diverge from the main Elliott wave count at the hourly chart level, so hourly charts will be provided for both today.
Summary: At this stage, the alternate II Elliott wave count is looking slightly more likely; Gold may be in a new downwards trend. A counter trend bounce to reach up to about 1,281 may unfold this week.
New updates to this analysis are in bold.
Grand SuperCycle analysis is here.
The last published monthly chart may be seen here.
At this stage, weekly charts will still be published daily to minimise confusion over why the daily charts are so different.
WEEKLY ELLIOTT WAVE COUNT
The first weekly chart will see super cycle wave (a) as a completed double zigzag, which is classified as a three wave structure.
So far from the low at 1,046 on the 3rd of December, 2015, there is a 5-3-5 structure upwards. This is either a completed zigzag (this main wave count) or a series of two first and second waves (an alternate published here). Both possibilities must be considered. At this stage, I will not publish the alternate, which sees it as two overlapping first and second waves, because it does not expect a different direction and has a low probability. I will continue to chart and follow it. If it diverges from any other published wave count, it may again be published. For now it is important to keep the number of published charts reasonable, so that members may follow this analysis.
If a zigzag upwards was complete at the last high, then it may be the first zigzag in a double for cycle wave a.
If cycle wave a is subdividing as a double zigzag, then that indicates a larger flat correction for super cycle wave (b). Super cycle wave (b) may be unfolding as an expanded flat in order to reach the depth required for it within Grand Super Cycle wave IV discussed with the monthly chart.
The first zigzag in the double is labelled primary wave W. The double is joined by a three in the opposite direction labelled primary wave X, which subdivides as a zigzag, the most common structure for X waves. X waves within double zigzags are normally relatively brief and shallow and so far this one is 12 weeks to the 30 weeks of primary wave W. So far it is relatively brief and corrected only 0.328 of primary wave W, so it is relatively shallow. So far this has a typical look.
The second zigzag in the double for primary wave Y may reasonably be expected to be about even in length and duration with primary wave W.
DAILY ELLIOTT WAVE COUNT
There is no rule stating a limit for X waves within double zigzags or double combinations. To achieve the purpose of a double zigzag, which is to deepen a correction, their X waves should be relatively brief and shallow. It would be highly unusual and defeat the purpose if primary wave X moved beyond the start of intermediate wave (C) of primary wave W below 1,200.07. This wave count should be discarded below that point.
Primary wave X is seen as a zigzag. Within primary wave X, intermediate wave (B) fits neatly as a triangle. This is supported by MACD hovering about zero as it unfolded. Any wave count which sees a triangle in this position should have a higher probability than a wave count which does not.
The zigzag downwards for primary wave X may again be complete, at all time frames. A target for primary wave Y upwards would be about 1,569 where primary wave Y would be about even in length with primary wave W.
HOURLY ELLIOTT WAVE COUNT
A five wave structure downwards may be complete for intermediate wave (C).
Intermediate wave (C) is just 0.99 short of 1.618 the length of intermediate wave (A).
A new high above 1,306.70 would invalidate the alternate II below, so provide some confidence in this main wave count. At that stage, price would be back within the prior consolidation zone and the downwards breakout following the triangle would look complete.
So far a small five up is complete, and it should be followed by a three down. This may be minute waves i and ii within minor wave 1.
Minute wave ii may end about the 0.618 Fibonacci ratio of minute wave i at 1,251. Minute wave ii may not move beyond the start of minute wave i below 1,242.87.
ALTERNATE II WEEKLY ELLIOTT WAVE COUNT
I will consider all possibilities that I can see that meet all Elliott wave rules.
What if super cycle wave (a) is a completed five and not a three? Does that fit?
If downwards movement is a five wave structure, it may only be cycle wave a within a larger zigzag of super cycle wave (a). It is more likely that Grand Super Cycle wave IV will be a zigzag, flat or triangle, which means super cycle wave (a) is most likely to be a zigzag. The least likely structure for Grand Super Cycle wave IV would be a single zigzag, so the least likely structure for super cycle wave (a) would be an impulse. This allows for alternation between the single zigzag of Grand Super Cycle wave II and a flat, combination or triangle for Grand Super Cycle wave IV.
Within cycle wave a, there is good alternation between the deep combination of primary wave 2 and the shallow zigzag of primary wave 4. Primary wave 2 is much longer in duration, but that is okay because combinations are more time consuming. Zigzags are the quickest of all corrective structures.
The – – – maroon channel is drawn about cycle wave a using Elliott’s technique. The whole structure is contained within it, with the exception of an overshoot for the middle of the third wave. This is a very common tendency; the middle of a third wave is often the strongest portion of an impulse and it ends with a swift strong fifth wave which commonly overshoots channels. This part of the wave count has a typical look.
If a five down is complete, then a three up should follow.
The problem now becomes to identify which one of more than 23 possible corrective structures cycle wave b may take. It may be a quick relatively shallow zigzag as labelled, or it may be about only half way through. This wave count sees it as possibly complete. If price breaks below 1,200.07, then this first wave count would be considered confirmed.
ALTERNATE II DAILY ELLIOTT WAVE COUNT
If there has been a trend change at a large degree at the last high, then what looks like a rather obvious triangle must be ignored. It is possible that a series of three overlapping first and second wave corrections has unfolded, but this does look less likely than a triangle.
The triangle may not be labelled as a second wave because second waves do not take the form of triangles.
This wave count is reverted to see minor wave 3 incomplete and minute wave iv within it now beginning. There is no Fibonacci ratio between minute waves i and iii.
Both ways of labelling this downwards wave are possible. This idea has a slightly higher invalidation point. Minute wave iv may not move into minute wave i price territory above 1,306.70.
Minute wave ii was a deep 0.81 zigzag lasting four days. Minute wave iv is least likely to be a zigzag to exhibit alternation and most likely to be a sideways flat, combination or triangle. It may last a bit longer than minute wave ii as sideways structures tend to be longer lasting than zigzags. It may last a Fibonacci five or eight days.
ALTERNATE II HOURLY ELLIOTT WAVE COUNT
This alternate wave count now should begin to diverge from the main wave count at the hourly chart level.
If minute wave iv unfolds as a flat or combination or triangle, then the first wave up within it should be a three wave structure. Minuette wave (a) may be unfolding as a zigzag. Subminuette wave a subdivided as a five wave structure. Subminuette wave b may not move beyond the start of subminuette wave a below 1,242.87.
When minuette wave (a) is a completed three wave structure, then minuette wave (b) should unfold downwards and should be very deep. It may make a new low below the start of minuette wave (a) at 1,242.87 if minute wave iv is an expanded flat or running triangle.
Minute wave iv may end about the 0.382 Fibonacci ratio of minute wave iii at 1,281.
ALTERNATE III WEEKLY ELLIOTT WAVE COUNT
This alternate wave count is identical to alternate II published above, with the exception of the degree of labelling within cycle wave b.
If the degree of labelling within cycle wave b is moved down one degree, then the zigzag may have been only the first in a double. It may also be a zigzag for wave A of a flat correction or triangle.
A double zigzag looks most likely for cycle wave b at this stage because it would be able to reach higher, so that cycle wave b is closer to the 0.618 Fibonacci ratio of cycle wave a, which is at 1,587. It also looks more likely because primary wave X looks likely to end soon, so to be shallow. Primary wave X looks likely to end soon because it looks like a triangle recently completed for wave B within it, which would be a zigzag.
A daily chart for this wave count would look the same as the first daily chart for the main wave count.
Click chart to enlarge. Chart courtesy of StockCharts.com.
A strong downwards week closes with a strong increase in volume. The fall in price is well supported by volume. Price has broken out of a consolidation to the downside.
A back test to support about 1,305 would be typical behaviour for price after a breakout.
On Balance Volume may be beginning to break below the yellow support line at the end of last week. However, there is a little leeway in exactly how this line is drawn and the break needs to be clearer before it may be interpreted as a bearish signal. If OBV turns up this week, then the line should be slightly redrawn.
There is some mid term divergence at the end of last week between price and RSI: RSI has made a lower low, but price has made a higher low (yellow lines). This divergence is bullish and indicates weakness in price. This divergence supports the main Elliott wave count and the alternate III count.
Click chart to enlarge. Chart courtesy of StockCharts.com.
A small upwards day comes with much lighter volume. This supports the alternate II Elliott wave count. If upwards movement continues to have no support from volume, then it would more likely be a counter trend bounce than a new upwards trend.
The yellow trend line on On Balance Volume may provide resistance and halt the rise in price.
RSI is returning from oversold. Some more upwards movement from price may be expected to bring RSI back into normal territory.
Price broke out of a long consolidation downwards. It would be typical behaviour to now see a counter trend bounce end about prior support, which should now provide resistance about 1,305.
ADX is above 15 and increasing. The -DX line is above the +DX line. ATR is showing some increase. Bollinger Bands are widening, so volatility has returned to the market. A downwards trend is indicated.
With price closing below the lower edge of Bollinger Bands for four days in a row, it would be typical behaviour to now see price move up towards the mid line of Bollinger Bands, to revert to the mean.
This analysis is published @ 06:45 p.m. EST.
This weak pathetic sideways movement looks bearish, very much so.
If the bullish wave counts are correct then price should be moving up strongly. This looks like a small pause in a downwards trend, not a new trend up.
Was the low today at 7:22 am of 1252.80 the bottom of wave 3 or 5 of minuette (c) and this was the wave up just now at 11:35 am of 1259.27 a 4th wave up of minuette (c) or was it a 1st wave up of minute wave 4?
Zoomed in look of the same idea.
I haven’t charted it yet, but the same basic idea may apply to GDX.
Lara, in looking at the chart symmetry over the last several years, it looks like gold may need to consolidate more before moving higher.
So I have an idea for your consideration. What if the entire move up from the bottom at 1,046 to the high at 1,375 was just the first 5 wave structure up? Let’s call it Primary A. So now we would be in Primary wave B and a B wave would not have the limitations on time and depth of an X wave. It could morph into a triangle or flat for example over the next few months before eventually breaking out higher.
This “consolidation” could offer another option to the current wave counts which expect either big up or down moves to start relatively soon. Thoughts?
The upwards wave to the last high on July 2016 looks like and subdivides as a three, not a five. Trying to count that as a five would be forced.
That’s the only way this idea of an incomplete zigzag up would fit.