Select Page

The first target for downwards movement has been met.

Summary: Downwards movement has met the first target, but there is no evidence yet that downwards movement is over. Volume is weak indicating bears are tired. If the lilac channel can be clearly breached by upwards movement, then it would be an earliest signal a low may be in place. The target is now at 1,240 while price is still within the channel.

New updates to this analysis are in bold.

Grand SuperCycle analysis is here.

The last published monthly chart may be seen here.

At this stage, weekly charts will still be published daily to minimise confusion over why the daily charts are so different.


Gold Elliott Wave Chart Weekly 2016
Click chart to enlarge.

The first weekly chart will see super cycle wave (a) as a completed double zigzag, which is classified as a three wave structure.

So far from the low at 1,046 on the 3rd of December, 2015, there is a 5-3-5 structure upwards. This is either a completed zigzag (this main wave count) or a series of two first and second waves (an alternate published here). Both possibilities must be considered. At this stage, I will not publish the alternate, which sees it as two overlapping first and second waves, because it does not expect a different direction and has a low probability. I will continue to chart and follow it. If it diverges from any other published wave count, it may again be published. For now it is important to keep the number of published charts reasonable, so that members may follow this analysis.

If a zigzag upwards was complete at the last high, then it may be the first zigzag in a double for cycle wave a.

If cycle wave a is subdividing as a double zigzag, then that indicates a larger flat correction for super cycle wave (b). Super cycle wave (b) may be unfolding as an expanded flat in order to reach the depth required for it within Grand Super Cycle wave IV discussed with the monthly chart.

The first zigzag in the double is labelled primary wave W. The double is joined by a three in the opposite direction labelled primary wave X, which subdivides as a zigzag, the most common structure for X waves. X waves within double zigzags are normally relatively brief and shallow and so far this one is 12 weeks to the 30 weeks of primary wave W. So far it is relatively brief and corrected only 0.328 of primary wave W, so it is relatively shallow. So far this has a typical look.

The second zigzag in the double for primary wave Y may reasonably be expected to be about even in length and duration with primary wave W.


Gold Elliott Wave Chart Daily 2016
Click chart to enlarge.

There is no rule stating a limit for X waves within double zigzags or double combinations. To achieve the purpose of a double zigzag, which is to deepen a correction, their X waves should be relatively brief and shallow. It would be highly unusual and defeat the purpose if primary wave X moved beyond the start of intermediate wave (C) of primary wave W below 1,200.07. This wave count should be discarded below that point.

Primary wave X is seen as a zigzag. Within primary wave X, intermediate wave (B) fits neatly as a triangle. This is supported by MACD hovering about zero as it unfolded. Any wave count which sees a triangle in this position should have a higher probability than a wave count which does not.

When the zigzag downwards for primary wave X may again be complete, at all time frames, then a target for primary wave Y upwards may again be calculated. Primary wave Y would be expected to be about even in length with primary wave W, which was 328.64.


Gold Elliott Wave Chart Hourly 2016
Click chart to enlarge.

A five wave structure downwards is still most likely incomplete for intermediate wave (C).

Intermediate wave (C) has passed equality in length with intermediate wave (A). The next target would be for intermediate wave (C) to reach 1.618 the length of intermediate wave (A) at 1,240. This is very close to 0.382 the length of primary wave W at 1,239. This target has a reasonable probability.

At any stage, a new high above 1,302.93 would invalidate the alternate II below, so provide some confidence in this main wave count. At that stage, price would be back within the prior consolidation zone and the downwards breakout following the triangle would look complete.

A best fit channel is drawn about minor wave 5 in lilac. If price breaks above the upper edge of this channel, that would be the first indication that minor wave 5 may be over. Price confirmation above 1,302.93 would still be required for a high level of confidence.

It must be expected that price is still likely to move lower while it remains within the channel.

In the short term, it looks like a fourth wave triangle may be unfolding. This may be followed by a relatively short final fifth wave down.


Gold Elliott Wave Chart Weekly 2016
Click chart to enlarge.

I will consider all possibilities that I can see that meet all Elliott wave rules.

What if super cycle wave (a) is a completed five and not a three? Does that fit?

If downwards movement is a five wave structure, it may only be cycle wave a within a larger zigzag of super cycle wave (a). It is more likely that Grand Super Cycle wave IV will be a zigzag, flat or triangle, which means super cycle wave (a) is most likely to be a zigzag. The least likely structure for Grand Super Cycle wave IV would be a single zigzag, so the least likely structure for super cycle wave (a) would be an impulse. This allows for alternation between the single zigzag of Grand Super Cycle wave II and a flat, combination or triangle for Grand Super Cycle wave IV.

Within cycle wave a, there is good alternation between the deep combination of primary wave 2 and the shallow zigzag of primary wave 4. Primary wave 2 is much longer in duration, but that is okay because combinations are more time consuming. Zigzags are the quickest of all corrective structures.

The – – – maroon channel is drawn about cycle wave a using Elliott’s technique. The whole structure is contained within it, with the exception of an overshoot for the middle of the third wave. This is a very common tendency; the middle of a third wave is often the strongest portion of an impulse and it ends with a swift strong fifth wave which commonly overshoots channels. This part of the wave count has a typical look.

If a five down is complete, then a three up should follow.

The problem now becomes to identify which one of more than 23 possible corrective structures cycle wave b may take. It may be a quick relatively shallow zigzag as labelled, or it may be about only half way through. This first wave count sees it as possibly complete. If price breaks below 1,200.07, then this first wave count would be considered confirmed.


Gold Elliott Wave Chart Daily 2016
Click chart to enlarge.

If there has been a trend change at a large degree at the last high, then what looks like a rather obvious triangle must be ignored. It is possible that a series of three overlapping first and second wave corrections has unfolded, but this does look less likely than a triangle.

The triangle may not be labelled as a second wave because second waves do not take the form of triangles.

If a new impulse downwards is unfolding, then at 1,248 minor wave 3 would reach 1.618 the length of minor wave A.

It is possible today that minute wave iv is complete as a relatively quick and shallow zigzag. It is common of Gold for fourth waves within its impulses to be much quicker than their counterpart second waves; this tendency occurs when the fifth wave is swift and strong. That may have happened here.

When minor wave 3 is complete, then minor wave 4 upwards may not move into minor wave 1 price territory above 1,302.93.


Gold Elliott Wave Chart Weekly 2016
Click chart to enlarge.

This alternate wave count is identical to alternate II published above, with the exception of the degree of labelling within cycle wave b.

If the degree of labelling within cycle wave b is moved down one degree, then the zigzag may have been only the first in a double. It may also be a zigzag for wave A of a flat correction or triangle.

A double zigzag looks most likely for cycle wave b at this stage because it would be able to reach higher, so that cycle wave b is closer to the 0.618 Fibonacci ratio of cycle wave a, which is at 1,587. It also looks more likely because primary wave X looks likely to end soon, so to be shallow. Primary wave X looks likely to end soon because it looks like a triangle recently completed for wave B within it, which would be a zigzag.

A daily chart for this wave count would look the same as the first daily chart for the main wave count.



Gold Weekly 2016
Click chart to enlarge. Chart courtesy of

Gold is no longer range bound. This week has clearly broken below prior support at 1,305. Price may find some support here about the 40 week moving average.

The bullish signal from divergence between price and RSI at the weekly chart level was proven to be unreliable in this instance. Unfortunately, this is the nature of technical analysis; no signal is going to be always reliable. All technical analysis is an effort based on probability.


Gold Daily 2016
Click chart to enlarge. Chart courtesy of

A triangle pattern developed and price has broken out of the triangle downwards. Using a triangle measurement, the movement after the breakout may be expected to be about 65 in length giving a target about 1,250. So far price has reached down to 1,251.8, so it is possible that downwards movement may end here if this target is correct.

Two days in a row now of downwards movement on declining volume indicates the bears are tired. The fall in price is not supported by volume today. A bounce or trend change will come, and it looks increasingly likely to be very close now.

In the fist instance, now that price has broken below support, a back test to find resistance about 1,305 may still be expected. This would be typical behaviour. How price behaves about this resistance line may indicate whether or not a new downwards trend is developing. If price can find strong resistance about 1,305 and move back down from there, then a new downwards trend should be expected. If price breaks above 1,305 and moves back upwards, then the breakout following the triangle may be over.

On Balance Volume has broken below the yellow line giving a bearish signal. More downwards movement would be a reasonable expectation after this. There is no divergence today between price and OBV to indicate weakness.

RSI is now more clearly oversold. There is still no divergence between price and RSI to indicate weakness. This is not always evident at lows. But if it does turn up during a clear downwards trend (and not as part of a consolidation), then it would be a strong signal for a trend change. That is not the case yet.

ADX is increasing and today is above 15. It is now indicating a trend in place. ATR today is increasing. Bollinger Bands continue to widen as volatility has returned. With these three indicators all in agreement today, confidence may be had that for now a new downwards trend is indicated.

Stochastics is breaking below its support line and moving into oversold. Stochastics may move further into oversold before it turns. There is no divergence today between price and Stocahstics to indicate weakness.

This analysis is published @ 09:35 p.m. EST.