Downwards movement continues now as expected and shows an increase in downwards momentum, which was also expected. The target remains the same and looks reasonable.

Summary: The target is at 1,306. Do not expect this swing to move in a straight line. There may be one more bounce on the way down, which may last one to a few days.

Classic technical analysis supports the main Elliott wave count. An upwards breakout from this consolidation that began in January looks most likely, which may be the last downwards swing within the consolidation. At lows next week there may be an excellent opportunity to open long positions; risk is reasonable though. Give the market room to move; support can be overshot only to see price whipsaw back into the consolidation zone. Reduce position size to allow room for the market to move and keep risk within 1-5% of equity.

Always responsibly manage your risk. Always trade with stops to protect your account.

New updates to this analysis are in bold.

Grand SuperCycle analysis is here.

Last in-depth historic analysis with monthly and several weekly charts is here, video is here.

There are multiple wave counts at this time at the weekly and monthly chart levels. In order to make this analysis manageable and accessible only two will be published on a daily basis, one bullish and one bearish. This does not mean the other possibilities may not be correct, only that publication of them all each day is too much to digest. At this stage, they do not diverge from the two possibilities below.

BULLISH ELLIOTT WAVE COUNT

FIRST WEEKLY CHART

Click chart to enlarge.

Cycle wave b may be a single zigzag. Zigzags subdivide 5-3-5. Primary wave C must subdivide as a five wave structure and may be either an impulse or an ending diagonal. Overlapping at this stage indicates an ending diagonal.

Within an ending diagonal, all sub-waves must subdivide as zigzags. Intermediate wave (4) must overlap into intermediate wave (1) price territory. This diagonal is expanding: intermediate wave (3) is longer than intermediate wave (1) and intermediate wave (4) is longer than intermediate wave (2). Intermediate wave (5) must be longer than intermediate wave (3), so it must end above 1,398.41 where it would reach equality in length with intermediate wave (3).

Within the final zigzag of intermediate wave (5), minor wave B may not move beyond the start of minor wave A below 1,236.54. However, if it were now to turn out to be relatively deep, it should not get too close to this invalidation point as the lower (2)-(4) trend line should provide strong support. Diagonals normally adhere very well to their trend lines.

Within the diagonal of primary wave C, each sub-wave is extending in price and so may also do so in time. Within each zigzag, minor wave B may exhibit alternation in structure and may show an increased duration.

Within intermediate wave (1), minor wave B was a triangle lasting 11 days. Within intermediate wave (3), minor wave B was a regular flat lasting 60 days. Intermediate wave (5) is expected to be longer in price than intermediate wave (3), and so it may also be longer in duration. Minor wave B within it may last longer than minor wave B within intermediate wave (3).

At this stage, minor wave B may now be a double flat or triangle. These two ideas are separated out in daily charts below.

This first weekly chart sees the upwards wave labelled primary wave A as a five wave structure. It must be acknowledged that this upwards wave looks better as a three than it does as a five. The fifth weekly chart below will consider the possibility that it was a three.

FIRST DAILY CHART – DOUBLE FLAT

Click chart to enlarge.

Minor wave B may be a relatively rare double flat correction.

Within this possible double flat, the first flat labelled minute wave w is a regular flat. The second flat labeled minute wave y may be an expanded flat, providing alternation with the first.

Within the expanded flat of minute wave y, minuette wave (b) is within the common range of from 1 to 1.38 times the length of minuette wave (a). The most common Fibonacci ratio for minuette wave (c) is used to calculate a target for it to end.

The target would see minute wave y end close to the same level as minute wave w; the double flat would have a sideways look and achieve its purpose of taking up time and moving sideways. This target is also within a strong area of support.

Minuette wave (c) should subdivide as a five wave structure. It may not move in a straight line, so do not expect it to. Within minuette wave (c), there may be expected to be two bounces for a second and fourth wave. The first bounce for subminuette wave ii now shows up as four green daily candlesticks. Next week, along the way down to the target, subminuette wave iv to come may also show up as one to four green daily candlesticks or doji, or a mixture of both. When it arrives, subminuette wave iv must remain below subminuette wave i price territory, below 1,333.84. A target for subminuette wave iii may be about 1,322 where it would reach 1.618 the length of subminuette wave i.

Minuette wave (c) would be extremely likely to move at least slightly below the end of minuette wave (a) at 1,320 to avoid a truncation and a very rare running flat.

HOURLY CHART – DOUBLE FLAT

Click chart to enlarge.

Subminuette wave iii looks to have begun. It may only subdivide as an impulse. The target expects the most common Fibonacci ratio to submineutte wave i.

So far the middle of subminuette wave iii may have passed at the end of Friday’s session.

The best fit channel should provide resistance along the way down for smaller bounces.

Within the impulse of submineutte wave iii, micro wave 4 may not move into micro wave 1 price territory above 1,349.69.

SECOND DAILY CHART – TRIANGLE

Click chart to enlarge.

This daily chart is identical to the first daily chart up to the high labelled minor wave A. Thereafter, it looks at a different structure for minor wave B.

A triangle for minor wave B may still be valid. Within a triangle, four of the five sub-waves must sub-divide as zigzags and one sub-wave usually subdivides as a double zigzag; the double zigzag is most commonly wave C of the triangle, but it may be any sub-wave. Here, it may have been minute wave b.

All remaining triangles must be simple A-B-C structures, most likely zigzags.

Within minute wave c, the bounce of minuette wave (b) may not move beyond the start of minuette wave (a) above 1,364.36.

Minute wave c may not move beyond the end of minute wave a below 1,303.08 for both a contracting or barrier triangle. Thereafter, minute wave d may not move above the end of minute wave b at 1,364.36 for a contracting triangle. For a barrier triangle, minute wave d may end about the same level as minute wave b in order for the b-d trend line to look essentially flat.

A final small zigzag downwards for minute wave e would most likely fall short of the a-c trend line.

This wave count still allows for choppy overlapping movement in an ever decreasing range for several weeks. Minor wave B may be as long lasting as a Fibonacci 21 weeks if it is a triangle, as triangles do tend to be very long lasting structures.

This wave count now expects a zigzag may be unfolding lower for minute wave c. At this stage, the subdivisions at the hourly chart level do not diverge from the main wave count; both counts expect to see 5-3-5 unfold lower. This count expects a zigzag and the main count expects a 1-2-3 of an impulse. At the point the two counts diverge in terms of structure at the hourly chart level, then separate hourly charts will be published for them.

BEARISH ELLIOTT WAVE COUNT

FIFTH WEEKLY CHART

Click chart to enlarge.

There were five weekly charts published in the last historic analysis. This fifth weekly chart is the most immediately bearish wave count, so this is published as a bearish possibility.

This fifth weekly chart sees cycle wave b as a flat correction, and within it intermediate wave (B) may be a complete triple zigzag. This would indicate a regular flat as intermediate wave (B) is less than 1.05 the length of intermediate wave (A).

If cycle wave b is a flat correction, then within it primary wave B must retrace a minimum 0.9 length of primary wave A at 1,079.13 or below. The most common length of B waves within flats is from 1 to 1.38 times the length of the A wave. The target calculated would see primary wave B end within this range.

I have only seen two triple zigzags before during my 10 years of daily Elliott wave analysis. If this wave count turns out to be correct, this would be the third. The rarity of this structure is identified on the chart.

FIFTH DAILY CHART

Click chart to enlarge.

Minor wave 1 may have been a relatively brief impulse over at the low of the 8th of February. Thereafter, minor wave 2 may be an incomplete double combination.

The first structure in the double may be a zigzag labelled minute wave w. The double may be joined by a three in the opposite direction, a zigzag labelled minute wave x. The second structure in the double may be an incomplete triangle labelled minute wave y. This structure may yet take some weeks to complete. In my experience a double combination with a triangle for minute wave y is not very common. This reduces the probability of this wave count, but it remains valid.

This wave count is a good solution for this bearish wave count. All subdivisions fit and there are no rare structures so far within intermediate wave (C).

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS

WEEKLY CHART

Click chart to enlarge. Chart courtesy of StockCharts.com.

Gold is within a small consolidation with resistance about 1,365 to (final) 1,375 and strong support about 1,310 to 1,305. Volume suggests an upwards breakout is more likely than downwards.

An inside week this week closes red with another long upper wick. Give reasonable weight to the two last long upper wicks. This supports the main Elliott wave count.

The new trend lines for On Balance Volume will offer the next signal when either one is breached.

DAILY CHART

Click chart to enlarge. Chart courtesy of StockCharts.com.

Gold is within a smaller consolidation that began back on about the 3rd of January. This consolidation is delineated by resistance about 1,360 to 1,365 and support about 1,310 to 1,305. It is the upwards days of the 15th of January and the 11th of April that have strongest volume. This strongly suggests an upwards breakout may be more likely than downwards.

Price was at resistance and exhibited divergence with Stochastics at the last high. It still looks reasonable to expect a downwards swing overall to continue here until price finds support and Stochastics reaches oversold. Do not expect this swing to move in a straight line because that is not how price moves within a consolidation.

Support at On Balance Volume is weak only. This line has only been tested once after it was breached.

GDX WEEKLY CHART

Click chart to enlarge. Chart courtesy of StockCharts.com.

Support about 20.80 has been tested about eight times and so far has held. The more often a support area is tested and holds, the more technical significance it has.

In the first instance, expect this area to continue to provide support. Only a strong downwards day, closing below support and preferably with some increase in volume, would constitute a downwards breakout from the consolidation that GDX has been in for a year now.

Resistance is about 25.50. Only a strong upwards day, closing above resistance and with support from volume, would constitute an upwards breakout.

Overall, a slow upwards swing may be underway. Do not expect it to move in a straight line; it may have downwards weeks within it.

GDX DAILY CHART

Click chart to enlarge. Chart courtesy of StockCharts.com.

On trading triangles from Dhalquist and Kirkpatrick, page 319:

“The ideal situation for trading triangles is a definite breakout, a high trading range within the triangle, an upward-sloping volume trend during the formation of the triangle, and especially a gap on the breakout. These patterns seem to work better with small-cap stocks in a rising market.

Although triangles are plentiful, their patterns suffer from many false and premature breakouts. This requires that a very strict breakout rule be used, either a wide filter or a number of closes outside the breakout zone. It also requires a close protective stop at the breakout level in case the breakout is false. Once these defensive levels have been exceeded, and price is on its way, the trader can relax for a little while because the failure rate after a legitimate breakout is relatively low. Trailing stops should then be placed at each preceding minor reversal.

…. in symmetrical triangles, the best performance comes from late breakouts in the 73% – 75% distance.

Volume on the breakout seems more desirable in symmetrical triangles.”

In this case, the breakout has come 61% of the triangle length from base to cradle. Volume towards the end of the triangle declined. The breakout is accompanied by a gap and has good support from volume.

Pullbacks occur 59% of the time for symmetrical triangles.

Any long positions entered on a pullback may use the breakaway gap as a place for stops just below 22.41. If that gap is closed, then it may be an exhaustion gap and the breakout may have failed. The gap remains open at this time. If this is correctly labelled as a breakaway gap, then price should bounce up from here. If it is closed, then next support may be about the upper trend line of the triangle.

A profit target is calculated by adding the triangle width to the breakout point. This gives a target at 24.61.

For the very short term, volume and support for On Balance Volume suggest an upwards day on Monday. This contradicts the technical analysis for Gold.

Published @ 02:00 a.m. EST on 21st April, 2018.