At least two different structures for this consolidation remain valid. The target remains the same.
Summary: For the short term, price may move higher to begin the new week to above 1,332.34 but not above 1,333.84. Alternatively, it may just move sideways for a few days remaining below 1,332.34.
Thereafter, the downwards swing may resume to the target at 1,306.
At its end this downwards swing may offer a very good entry point for a long position prior to an upwards breakout. This downwards swing may be the last swing within the consolidation that began back in January.
Always trade with stops to protect your account. Risk only 1-5% of equity on any one trade.
New updates to this analysis are in bold.
Grand SuperCycle analysis is here.
Last in-depth historic analysis with monthly and several weekly charts is here, video is here.
There are multiple wave counts at this time at the weekly and monthly chart levels. In order to make this analysis manageable and accessible only two will be published on a daily basis, one bullish and one bearish. This does not mean the other possibilities may not be correct, only that publication of them all each day is too much to digest. At this stage, they do not diverge from the two possibilities below.
BULLISH ELLIOTT WAVE COUNT
FIRST WEEKLY CHART
Cycle wave b may be a single zigzag. Zigzags subdivide 5-3-5. Primary wave C must subdivide as a five wave structure and may be either an impulse or an ending diagonal. Overlapping at this stage indicates an ending diagonal.
Within an ending diagonal, all sub-waves must subdivide as zigzags. Intermediate wave (4) must overlap into intermediate wave (1) price territory. This diagonal is expanding: intermediate wave (3) is longer than intermediate wave (1) and intermediate wave (4) is longer than intermediate wave (2). Intermediate wave (5) must be longer than intermediate wave (3), so it must end above 1,398.41 where it would reach equality in length with intermediate wave (3).
Within the final zigzag of intermediate wave (5), minor wave B may not move beyond the start of minor wave A below 1,236.54. However, if it were now to turn out to be relatively deep, it should not get too close to this invalidation point as the lower (2)-(4) trend line should provide strong support. Diagonals normally adhere very well to their trend lines.
Within the diagonal of primary wave C, each sub-wave is extending in price and so may also do so in time. Within each zigzag, minor wave B may exhibit alternation in structure and may show an increased duration.
Within intermediate wave (1), minor wave B was a triangle lasting 11 days. Within intermediate wave (3), minor wave B was a regular flat lasting 60 days. Intermediate wave (5) is expected to be longer in price than intermediate wave (3), and so it may also be longer in duration. Minor wave B within it may last longer than minor wave B within intermediate wave (3).
At this stage, minor wave B may now be a double flat or triangle. These two ideas are separated out in daily charts below.
This first weekly chart sees the upwards wave labelled primary wave A as a five wave structure. It must be acknowledged that this upwards wave looks better as a three than it does as a five. The fifth weekly chart below will consider the possibility that it was a three.
FIRST DAILY CHART – DOUBLE FLAT
Minor wave B may be a relatively rare double flat correction.
Within this possible double flat, the first flat labelled minute wave w is a regular flat. The second flat labeled minute wave y may be an expanded flat, providing alternation with the first.
Within the expanded flat of minute wave y, minuette wave (b) is within the common range of from 1 to 1.38 times the length of minuette wave (a). The most common Fibonacci ratio for minuette wave (c) is used to calculate a target for it to end. The target is now widened to a small zone with a second calculation at subminuette degree.
The target would see minute wave y end close to the same level as minute wave w; the double flat would have a sideways look and achieve its purpose of taking up time and moving sideways. This target is also within a strong area of support.
Minuette wave (c) may now be completing as a five wave impulse, and within it subminuette wave iv may be continuing further. Subminuette wave ii was a deep 0.69 double zigzag lasting four days. Subminuette wave iv may be continuing as an expanded flat that so far has lasted four days. If it continues for a further one or two days, it may total five or six, which would still have good proportion with subminuette wave ii.
HOURLY CHART – DOUBLE FLAT
At the hourly chart level, micro wave B is just 1.06 times the length of micro wave A. This indicates an expanded flat may be completing. If subminuette wave iv is a flat, then micro wave C would be very likely to make at least a slight new high above 1,332.34 to avoid a truncation and a very rare running flat.
It is also possible that subminuette wave iv may complete as a triangle, and that may last longer than just another one or two days. If price moves higher but remains below 1,332.34, then a triangle will also be published. A triangle would expect choppy and overlapping sideways movement for another few days.
When subminuette wave iv may be again seen as complete, then subminuette wave v may begin down to the target.
SECOND DAILY CHART – TRIANGLE
This daily chart is identical to the first daily chart up to the high labelled minor wave A. Thereafter, it looks at a different structure for minor wave B.
A triangle for minor wave B may still be valid. Within a triangle, four of the five sub-waves must sub-divide as zigzags and one sub-wave usually subdivides as a double zigzag; the double zigzag is most commonly wave C of the triangle, but it may be any sub-wave. Here, it may have been minute wave b.
All remaining triangles must be simple A-B-C structures, most likely zigzags.
It is again possible now that minute wave c may have been over. Triangles normally adhere strictly to their trend lines; with downwards movement continuing this week, the lower a-c trend line now has no overshoots nor breaches.
Minute wave c may not move beyond the end of minute wave a below 1,303.08 for both a contracting or barrier triangle. Thereafter, minute wave d may not move above the end of minute wave b at 1,364.36 for a contracting triangle. For a barrier triangle, minute wave d may end about the same level as minute wave b in order for the b-d trend line to look essentially flat.
A final small zigzag downwards for minute wave e would most likely fall short of the a-c trend line.
This wave count still allows for choppy overlapping movement in an ever decreasing range for several weeks. Minor wave B may be as long lasting as a Fibonacci 21 weeks if it is a triangle, as triangles do tend to be very long lasting structures.
BEARISH ELLIOTT WAVE COUNT
FIFTH WEEKLY CHART
There were five weekly charts published in the last historic analysis. This fifth weekly chart is the most immediately bearish wave count, so this is published as a bearish possibility.
This fifth weekly chart sees cycle wave b as a flat correction.
If cycle wave b is a flat correction, then within it primary wave B must retrace a minimum 0.9 length of primary wave A at 1,079.13 or below. The most common length of B waves within flats is from 1 to 1.38 times the length of the A wave. The target calculated would see primary wave B end within this range.
Primary wave B may be subdividing as a regular flat correction, and within it both intermediate waves (A) and (B) subdivide as three wave structures. Intermediate wave (B) fits as a triple zigzag.
I have only seen two triple zigzags before during my 10 years of daily Elliott wave analysis. If this wave count turns out to be correct, this would be the third. The rarity of this structure is identified on the chart.
FIFTH DAILY CHART
Minor wave 1 may have been a relatively brief impulse over at the low of the 8th of February. Thereafter, minor wave 2 may be an incomplete double combination.
The first structure in the double may be a zigzag labelled minute wave w. The double may be joined by a three in the opposite direction, a zigzag labelled minute wave x. The second structure in the double may be an incomplete triangle labelled minute wave y. This structure may yet take some weeks to complete. In my experience a double combination with a triangle for minute wave y is not very common. This reduces the probability of this wave count, but it remains valid.
This wave count is a good solution for this bearish wave count. All subdivisions fit and there are no rare structures so far within intermediate wave (C).
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
WEEKLY CHART
Click chart to enlarge. Chart courtesy of StockCharts.com.
Gold is within a small consolidation with resistance about 1,365 to (final) 1,375 and strong support about 1,310 to 1,305. Volume suggests an upwards breakout is more likely than downwards.
The long lower wick on this last weekly candlestick suggests a bounce for next week, as does support for On Balance Volume.
DAILY CHART
Click chart to enlarge. Chart courtesy of StockCharts.com.
Gold is within a smaller consolidation that began back on about the 3rd of January. This consolidation is delineated by resistance about 1,360 to 1,365 and support about 1,310 to 1,305. It is the upwards days of the 15th of January and the 11th of April that have strongest volume. This strongly suggests an upwards breakout may be more likely than downwards.
Price was at resistance and exhibited divergence with Stochastics at the last high. It still looks reasonable to expect a downwards swing overall to continue here until price finds support and Stochastics reaches oversold. Do not expect this swing to move in a straight line because that is not how price moves within a consolidation.
Very weak volume for Friday suggests upwards movement is weak and may be limited. This offers some support to the Elliott wave count that sees it is a counter trend movement within this downwards swing. Stochastics is oversold, but price is not yet at support.
GDX WEEKLY CHART
Click chart to enlarge. Chart courtesy of StockCharts.com.
Support about 20.80 has been tested about eight times and so far has held. The more often a support area is tested and holds, the more technical significance it has.
In the first instance, expect this area to continue to provide support. Only a strong downwards day, closing below support and preferably with some increase in volume, would constitute a downwards breakout from the consolidation that GDX has been in for a year now.
Resistance is about 25.50. Only a strong upwards day, closing above resistance and with support from volume, would constitute an upwards breakout.
Overall, a slow upwards swing may be underway. Do not expect it to move in a straight line; it may have downwards weeks within it.
GDX DAILY CHART
Click chart to enlarge. Chart courtesy of StockCharts.com.
On trading triangles from Dhalquist and Kirkpatrick, page 319:
“The ideal situation for trading triangles is a definite breakout, a high trading range within the triangle, an upward-sloping volume trend during the formation of the triangle, and especially a gap on the breakout. These patterns seem to work better with small-cap stocks in a rising market.
Although triangles are plentiful, their patterns suffer from many false and premature breakouts. This requires that a very strict breakout rule be used, either a wide filter or a number of closes outside the breakout zone. It also requires a close protective stop at the breakout level in case the breakout is false. Once these defensive levels have been exceeded, and price is on its way, the trader can relax for a little while because the failure rate after a legitimate breakout is relatively low. Trailing stops should then be placed at each preceding minor reversal.
…. in symmetrical triangles, the best performance comes from late breakouts in the 73% – 75% distance.
Volume on the breakout seems more desirable in symmetrical triangles.”
In this case, the breakout has come 61% of the triangle length from base to cradle. Volume towards the end of the triangle declined. The breakout is accompanied by a gap and has good support from volume.
Pullbacks occur 59% of the time for symmetrical triangles.
Any long positions entered on a pullback may use the breakaway gap as a place for stops just below 22.41. If that gap is closed, then it may be an exhaustion gap and the breakout may have failed. The gap remains open at this time. If this is correctly labelled as a breakaway gap, then price should bounce up from here. If it is closed, then next support may be about the upper trend line of the triangle.
A profit target is calculated by adding the triangle width to the breakout point. This gives a target at 24.61.
This downwards pullback may be a pullback after the triangle breakout; it may be deep and find support about the upper edge of the triangle trend lines. Upwards movement of the last three days is very weak, so it looks reasonable to expect GDX to move lower next week.
Published @ 04:02 a.m. EST on 28th April, 2018.
I think minor B is over today, at support
Current gold’s correction shall not be surprise to anyone here. Lara’s excellent analysis has been on target for a month for this chop.
I am glad I am in good hands!!
If gold here goes higher than 1324, would that mean minor wave B is complete?
Hi Ari, I agree. The relative strength of the miners is a positive sign! I have been watching the miners carefully. I think GDX has a little more down to go and then it will be an excellent buy. Looking for around 21.85 or maybe even 21.50. I hope it gets there.
Thanks for your interest. There have been few comments here lately, so not much motivation to post. I guess the sideways chop has worn everyone down. When everyone “loses interest “ is usually when the big moves happen. 😴
I’ll post some charts as price bottoms this week. Maybe we can stir up some interest 🤔
Thanks Dreamer. Yes I think everyone has been waiting patiently.
Today’s price action on the miners again seems very resilient so far. Let’s see what the rest of the day shows.
I lurk often. Don’t have much to input. I do appreciate the thoughts of all.
Dreamer, any chance you can post your GDX count like you used to? It was very helpful in the past 🙂
The resilience of GDX to go lower than 22.50 while gold has dropped $30 is very telling I think…