Upwards movement continues overall as the main Elliott wave count expects.
Both the main and alternate Elliott wave counts remain valid.
Summary: The target is now at 1,431. Further and substantial confidence in an upwards trend may be had now if price makes a new high above 1,333.84.
Always trade with stops to protect your account. Risk only 1-5% of equity on any one trade.
New updates to this analysis are in bold.
Grand SuperCycle analysis is here.
Last in-depth historic analysis with monthly and several weekly charts is here, video is here.
There are multiple wave counts at this time at the weekly and monthly chart levels. In order to make this analysis manageable and accessible only two will be published on a daily basis, one bullish and one bearish. This does not mean the other possibilities may not be correct, only that publication of them all each day is too much to digest. At this stage, they do not diverge from the two possibilities below.
BULLISH ELLIOTT WAVE COUNT
FIRST WEEKLY CHART
Cycle wave b may be a single zigzag. Zigzags subdivide 5-3-5. Primary wave C must subdivide as a five wave structure and may be either an impulse or an ending diagonal. Overlapping at this stage indicates an ending diagonal.
Within an ending diagonal, all sub-waves must subdivide as zigzags. Intermediate wave (4) must overlap into intermediate wave (1) price territory. This diagonal is expanding: intermediate wave (3) is longer than intermediate wave (1) and intermediate wave (4) is longer than intermediate wave (2). Intermediate wave (5) must be longer than intermediate wave (3), so it must end above 1,398.41 where it would reach equality in length with intermediate wave (3).
Within the final zigzag of intermediate wave (5), minor wave B may not move beyond the start of minor wave A below 1,236.54. However, if it were now to turn out to be relatively deep, it should not get too close to this invalidation point as the lower (2)-(4) trend line should provide strong support. Diagonals normally adhere very well to their trend lines.
Within the diagonal of primary wave C, each sub-wave is extending in price and so may also do so in time. Within each zigzag, minor wave B may exhibit alternation in structure and may show an increased duration.
Within intermediate wave (1), minor wave B was a triangle lasting 11 days. Within intermediate wave (3), minor wave B was a regular flat lasting 60 days. Intermediate wave (5) is expected to be longer in price than intermediate wave (3), and it may also be longer in duration, and so minor wave B within it may also be longer in duration. If minor wave B is over at the last low, it would have lasted 68 days.
This first weekly chart sees the upwards wave labelled primary wave A as a five wave structure. It must be acknowledged that this upwards wave looks better as a three than it does as a five. The fifth weekly chart below will consider the possibility that it was a three.
FIRST DAILY CHART
Minor wave B may be a complete single regular flat correction. Within the flat, minute wave a is a three, a single zigzag, and minute wave b is a three, a double zigzag, and minute wave c is a five that has moved price slightly below the end of minute wave a. There is a very close Fibonacci ratio of equality between minute waves a and c.
Regular flats normally fit very well into parallel channels. Minute wave c has found support almost exactly at the lower edge of this channel. This gives the flat correction the right look.
HOURLY CHART
There may now be two first waves complete, and now another second wave correction to continue lower early next week.
The green Elliott channel is not working well to show when minute wave c of minor wave B downwards is complete. The channel was breached yet price turned back into it.
Minuette wave (ii) may end about the 0.618 Fibonacci ratio at 1,312.53. Thereafter, upwards movement may show some increase in momentum.
FIRST DAILY CHART – ALTERNATE
It is possible that the impulse for minute wave c is incomplete. The last seven days may be minuette wave (iv) only. There is now a little disproportion between the corrections of minuette waves (ii) and (iv). Both are double zigzags, so there is no alternation in structure. The probability of this wave count is reduced.
Minute wave c may end with a small overshoot of the lower pink trend line. Strong support is still in the zone about 1,300 to 1,310, so not much if any movement below this zone would be expected for this wave count.
Minuette wave (iv) has breached a channel drawn using Elliott’s first technique. The channel is redrawn using Elliott’s second technique.
Minuette wave (iv) may not move into minuette wave (i) price territory above 1,333.84.
This wave count may be discarded prior to invalidation if upwards movement continues and has support from volume.
HOURLY CHART
Minuette wave (iv) may have moved higher as a single zigzag on Friday. There is now a little alternation with the double zigzag of minuette wave (ii).
The target for minuette wave (v) expects the most common Fibonacci ratio to minuette wave (i). This may see support slightly overshot before price turns and moves higher.
BEARISH ELLIOTT WAVE COUNT
FIFTH WEEKLY CHART
There were five weekly charts published in the last historic analysis. This fifth weekly chart is the most immediately bearish wave count, so this is published as a bearish possibility.
This fifth weekly chart sees cycle wave b as a flat correction.
If cycle wave b is a flat correction, then within it primary wave B must retrace a minimum 0.9 length of primary wave A at 1,079.13 or below. The most common length of B waves within flats is from 1 to 1.38 times the length of the A wave. The target calculated would see primary wave B end within this range.
Primary wave B may be subdividing as a regular flat correction, and within it both intermediate waves (A) and (B) subdivide as three wave structures. Intermediate wave (B) fits as a triple zigzag.
I have only seen two triple zigzags before during my 10 years of daily Elliott wave analysis. If this wave count turns out to be correct, this would be the third. The rarity of this structure is identified on the chart.
FIFTH DAILY CHART
Minor wave 1 may have been a relatively brief impulse over at the low of the 8th of February. Thereafter, minor wave 2 may be an incomplete double combination.
The first structure in the double may be a zigzag labelled minute wave w. The double may be joined by a three in the opposite direction, a zigzag labelled minute wave x. The second structure in the double may be an incomplete running triangle labelled minute wave y. This structure may yet take some weeks to complete. In my experience a double combination with a triangle for minute wave y is not very common. This reduces the probability of this wave count, but it remains valid.
This wave count is a good solution for this bearish wave count. All subdivisions fit and there are no rare structures so far within intermediate wave (C).
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
WEEKLY CHART
Click chart to enlarge. Chart courtesy of StockCharts.com.
Gold is within a small consolidation with resistance about 1,365 to (final) 1,375 and strong support about 1,310 to 1,305. Volume suggests an upwards breakout is more likely than downwards.
This week’s candlestick has support from volume, which is bullish.
Gold looks reasonably bullish at the weekly chart level.
DAILY CHART
Click chart to enlarge. Chart courtesy of StockCharts.com.
Gold is within a consolidation that began back on about the 3rd of January. This consolidation is delineated by resistance about 1,360 to 1,365 and support about 1,310 to 1,300. It is the upwards days of the 15th of January and the 11th of April that have strongest volume. This strongly suggests an upwards breakout may be more likely than downwards.
Price has found support. Bullish divergence with Stochastics while it is oversold is clear. With a few long lower wicks and support about the 200 day moving average, it looks like Gold has found a low.
Friday’s session moved price higher, but the balance of volume was down and the session closed red. Volume was very light; the market fell of its own weight during Friday’s session. This offers a little support to the first daily and hourly Elliott wave charts.
It is possible that lows may again be tested, but expect very strong support in the zone 1,310 – 1,300.
GDX WEEKLY CHART
Click chart to enlarge. Chart courtesy of StockCharts.com.
Support about 20.80 has been tested about eight times and so far has held. The more often a support area is tested and holds, the more technical significance it has.
In the first instance, expect this area to continue to provide support. Only a strong downwards day, closing below support and preferably with some increase in volume, would constitute a downwards breakout from the consolidation that GDX has been in for a year now.
Resistance is about 25.50. Only a strong upwards day, closing above resistance and with support from volume, would constitute an upwards breakout.
Overall, a slow upwards swing may be underway. Do not expect it to move in a straight line; it may have downwards weeks within it.
The short term volume profile remains bearish, but this week On Balance Volume gives a bullish signal.
GDX DAILY CHART
Click chart to enlarge. Chart courtesy of StockCharts.com.
On trading triangles from Dhalquist and Kirkpatrick, page 319:
“The ideal situation for trading triangles is a definite breakout, a high trading range within the triangle, an upward-sloping volume trend during the formation of the triangle, and especially a gap on the breakout. These patterns seem to work better with small-cap stocks in a rising market.
Although triangles are plentiful, their patterns suffer from many false and premature breakouts. This requires that a very strict breakout rule be used, either a wide filter or a number of closes outside the breakout zone. It also requires a close protective stop at the breakout level in case the breakout is false. Once these defensive levels have been exceeded, and price is on its way, the trader can relax for a little while because the failure rate after a legitimate breakout is relatively low. Trailing stops should then be placed at each preceding minor reversal.
…. in symmetrical triangles, the best performance comes from late breakouts in the 73% – 75% distance.
Volume on the breakout seems more desirable in symmetrical triangles.”
In this case, the breakout has come 61% of the triangle length from base to cradle. Volume towards the end of the triangle declined. The breakout is accompanied by a gap and has good support from volume.
Pullbacks occur 59% of the time for symmetrical triangles.
It looks like the pullback may be over. Price found support.
On Balance Volume gives a clear bullish signal with a break above resistance. This signal is reasonable as this resistance line is long held and tested many times. But it is not very strong because it has been broken once and has a reasonable slope. This could turn out to be another false signal.
It should also be noted that since the 28th of February On Balance Volume has been overall rising, which is bullish. On Balance Volume has made a new high above the high of the 19th of April, but price has not. This is also bullish.
GDX continues to look more clearly bullish than Gold at this stage.
Published @ 06:00 p.m. EST on 12th May, 2018.
Main hourly chart updated:
Alternate hourly chart updated:
Retest of low may be possible. In hour period Gold is forming top HnS. It will be confirmed once price drops below 1317.
One hourly HnS top confirmed.
While we need to see another few days to determine if Lara’s Main or Daily Alternate counts are correct, I’m leaning toward the Daily Alternate for Gold at this time.
Here’s a look at my hourly GDX count that matches up with the Daily Alternate for Gold. It would still look better for the GDX chart if a deeper correction was made from the leading contracting diagonal that I have for Minor wave 1. Also, a deeper correction would likely bottom near the small symmetrical triangle apex.
Target for this idea is near 21.81. Let’s see what happens…
https://www.tradingview.com/x/QpcXaLLE/
A good wave count. I agree, I’m leaning a bit more to one more test of lows for Gold before up and away.
I’m going to disagree. Very respectfully of course… USD still overbought. It has closed 2 weeks in a row above its upper bollinger band… it needs to correct. And with that gold gets its initial wave to upside.
Also silver and miners already leading the way higher. Last time gold tested 1300 area GDX came down to low 21’s, and this time it couldn’t break 22…
But that’s what makes markets… disagreements over the same data 🙂
Let’s see what happens.
Cheers 🙂
Yes, good point. The $$$ may have topped. We’ll see.
Well, with what Papudi posted above it looks like we’re going a bit lower. But I still have my doubts for GDX going below 22.
22.30-22.50 will be my buy in range, of course things are always changing.