Yearly Archives: 2017

GOLD Elliott Wave Technical Analysis – 27th November, 2017

Gold remains within a consolidation.

On Balance Volume is at this stage constrained now by resistance and support lines, with five tests of each line. A breakout by On Balance Volume would be a strong signal here.

Continue reading GOLD Elliott Wave Technical Analysis – 27th November, 2017

SILVER Elliott Wave Technical Analysis – 22nd November, 2017

Last analysis expected a triangle was either complete, or that it may complete very soon. The triangle is continuing sideways, and the trend lines are adjusted this week.

This week’s Silver analysis now neatly agrees with the current Gold analysis.

Continue reading SILVER Elliott Wave Technical Analysis – 22nd November, 2017

GOLD Elliott Wave Technical Analysis – 21st November, 2017

A little upwards movement fits the second Elliott wave count again quite nicely. This preferred wave count expects some more sideways movement, and then a breakout from the range Gold has been contained in now for some weeks.

Continue reading GOLD Elliott Wave Technical Analysis – 21st November, 2017

Amazon Trend Lines | 21st November, 2017

Unlike Google, Amazon does not have a neat a trend line.

AMZN 2017
Click chart to enlarge.

The solid yellow trend line is Amazon’s equivalent to the Google Forever trend line. The bottom line is that we should assume that Amazon remains in a bull market while price remains above this trend line.

The more recent red channel is an attempt to show where price is more recently finding support and may find resistance.

Note that during this bull market volume has shown a fairly steady decline, at least since January 2009 and probably before that. A bull market which is rising on light and declining volume is unsustainable, theoretically. The fact though is that Amazon has been rising on declining volume for years now.

This decline in volume may indicate that eventually when a high is found the next bear market may be very fast indeed. There would be very little support below to halt a fall in price because volume is so light.

Published @ 01:03 p.m. EST.

GOLD Elliott Wave Technical Analysis – 16th November, 2017

Last analysis warned Elliott Wave Gold members that gold may continue sideways in the current consolidation for a while yet. Another very small range day moves price essentially sideways on very light volume.

This market is consolidating. Volume will be used to guide as to which direction the breakout is most likely. Stochastics along with support and resistance will be used to indicate when one swing with the consolation ends and the next begins.

Continue reading GOLD Elliott Wave Technical Analysis – 16th November, 2017

SILVER Elliott Wave Technical Analysis – 16th November, 2017

Price was expected to move higher, but sideways movement suggests a triangle is forming for the short term.

Two Elliott wave triangle counts are considered, and the classic symmetrical triangle is examined in this analysis.

Summary: A triangle may be either complete or complete very soon. Watch for the breakout; it may come within a few days. Some trading guidance for triangles is given from Dhalquist and Kirkpatrick in the classic technical analysis section.

New updates to this analysis are in bold.

Last monthly chart is here.




Silver weekly 2017
Click chart to enlarge.

Cycle wave b may be completing as a double combination: zigzag – X – flat. The second structure, a flat correction for primary wave Y, may be underway.

Within a flat correction, intermediate wave (B) must retrace a minimum 0.9 length of intermediate wave (A) at 15.938. Intermediate wave (B) has met this minimum requirement; the rule for a flat correction is met. Intermediate wave (B) is longer than 1.05 times the length of intermediate wave (A) indicating this may be an expanded flat. Expanded flat corrections are the most common type. Normally their C waves are 1.618 or 2.618 the length of their A waves.

The target calculated would see primary wave Y to end close to same level as primary wave W about 21.062. The purpose of combinations is to take up time and move price sideways. To achieve this purpose the second structure in the double normally ends about the same level as the first.

While the combination wave count at the weekly chart level does not currently work for Gold, it does still work for Silver. They do not have to complete the same structures for cycle wave b, and fairly often their structures are different.


Silver daily 2017
Click chart to enlarge.

For this first wave count, upwards movement for intermediate wave (C) must subdivide as a five wave structure. It may be unfolding as an impulse.

Within the impulse of intermediate wave (C), only minor wave 1 was over at the last high and now minor wave 2 may now be complete.

Minor wave 2 may have ended very close to the most likely point of the 0.618 Fibonacci ratio of minor wave 1 at 16.347.

Minor wave 1 lasted 44 days. Minor wave 2 may have completed in 20 days, just one short of a Fibonacci 21.

Minor wave 3 may only subdivide as an impulse. It would be very likely to show its subdivisions clearly at the daily chart level. Minute waves ii and iv within it should show up as multi day pullbacks or sideways consolidations. Minute wave ii now shows up at the weekly and daily chart levels.

Within minute wave iii, no second wave correction may move beyond its start below 16.602.

A base channel is added to minor waves 1 and 2. Downwards movement is finding very strong support at the lower edge of this base channel. If price breaks below the base channel, then the probability of this wave count would substantially reduce prior to invalidation.

This wave count now expects to see a strong increase in upwards momentum as a third wave up at three degrees unfolds. The fact that strong upwards movement has failed so far to materialise must reduce the probability now of this wave count.



Silver daily 2017
Click chart to enlarge.

It remains possible for Silver that a large regular contracting or regular barrier triangle may be completing.

Within a triangle, one of the sub-waves must be a more complicated multiple, usually a multiple zigzag. This may be complete for primary wave B.

Primary wave C upwards may now be complete. The upper A-C trend line does have a fairly steep slope though, so it must be accepted that primary wave C may not be over and may continue higher. If it does, it may not move beyond the end of primary wave A above 21.062.

Primary wave C must subdivide as a three wave zigzag.

This triangle wave count now expects that primary wave D downwards may now be underway. Two scenarios for how it subdivides are presented below at the daily chart level.

Primary wave D of a contracting triangle may not move beyond the end of primary wave B below 15.197.

Primary wave D of a barrier triangle may end about the same level as primary wave B at 15.197; as long as the B-D trend line is essentially flat, the triangle will remain valid. Unfortunately, there is some subjectivity in this rule; it is not black and white.


Silver daily 2017
Click chart to enlarge.

Primary wave D must subdivide as a zigzag. Within the zigzag, intermediate wave (B) may be any corrective structure. At this stage, it may be a complete regular contracting triangle.

Minor wave E slightly overshoots the A-C trend line. Sometimes triangles end with a small overshoot.

If price begins to move strongly lower and makes a new low below 16.602, then confidence may be had in this wave count.

The target for primary wave D expects to see the most common Fibonacci ratio between intermediate waves (A) and (C).


Silver daily 2017
Click chart to enlarge.

When an Elliott wave triangle is considered, it is vital to always consider alternate ways to label the triangle.

The triangle may be minor wave B within intermediate wave (B). The breakout may be upwards.

Within the triangle, minute wave e may not move beyond the end of minute wave c. A new low below 16.814 would invalidate this triangle idea and add some confidence to the main wave count above.

Within the zigzag of intermediate wave (B), minor wave C would be very likely to make at least a slight new high above the end of minor wave A at 17.094 to avoid a truncation.



Silver Chart Weekly 2017
Click chart to enlarge. Chart courtesy of

The strongest week during this large consolidation is a downwards week ending 12th of June. However, this is stronger by only a small margin. The next strongest week is an upwards week. It may be better to look at daily volume bars to determine the most likely direction of a breakout from this consolidation.

The last two completed weeks moved price higher with an increase in volume. This is bullish.

Another weak bullish signal comes this week from On Balance Volume.

This chart supports the first and second alternate Elliott wave counts.


Silver Chart Daily 2017
Click chart to enlarge. Chart courtesy of

Volume suggests an upwards breakout from the symmetrical triangle.

The last day though is very bearish. The long upper wick is bearish as is volume.

From Dhalquist and Kirkpatrick regarding symmetrical triangles:

“The breakout is usually upwards (54% of the time). Symmetrical triangles have many false breakouts and must be watched carefully. The breakout commonly occurs between 73% and 75% of the length of the triangle from base to cradle. Throwbacks and pullbacks occur 37% and 59% of the time respectively, and, as in most patterns, when they occur, they detract from eventual performance. This implies that for actual investment or trading, the initial breakout should be acted upon, and if a pullback or throwback occurs, the protective stop should the tightened.”

And regarding trading triangles:

“The ideal situation for trading triangles is a definite breakout, a high trading range within the triangle, an upward-sloping volume trend during the formation of the triangle, and especially a gap on the breakout.

Although triangles are plentiful, their patterns suffer from many false and premature breakouts. This requires that a very strict breakout rule be used, either a wide filter or a number of closes outside the breakout zone. It also requires a close protective stop at the breakout level in case the breakout is false. Once these defensive levels have been exceeded, and price is on its way, the trader can relax for a little while because the failure rate after a legitimate breakout is relatively low Trailing stops should then be placed at each preceding minor reversal.”

For the example in the chart above, a breakout is required either above (54% likely) or below the trend lines. It should come soon now as price is close to about 75% the length of the triangle. It will be there in about two more days.

A gap on the breakout would increase performance. Volume supporting movement would also provide confidence. Stops may be set just above or below the triangle trend lines; below if an upwards breakout or above if a downwards breakout occurs. A position should be entered on the breakout, but do not wait for a throwback or pullback as it may not come.

Published @ 01:11 a.m. EST.

[Note: Analysis is public today for promotional purposes. Specific trading advice and comments will remain private for members only.]

Continue reading SILVER Elliott Wave Technical Analysis – 16th November, 2017